Pages

Friday, October 12, 2012

Why We Should Legalize Marijuana


 It’s common to hear your friend or parents stigmatize weed as a “bad” or “unhealthy” activity, worse than alcohol or cigarettes. It’s so terrible for you! They say, LOOK AT ALL THOSE POTHEADS! They are failing school and have none future!

But hah, the effects of marijuana have long been over exaggerated in the press and in the government. Media and entertainment portray it as a super deadly substance and that it  will harm and transform us into low-IQ hoodlums.
                                                 
                                            


But according to data from science, weed does not actually have all these serious harms.

The three most prominent notions of weed are that is causes lung disease, is addictive, and is a gateway drug.  

They are all WAY over exaggerated.

1. MARIJUANA CAUSES LUNG DISEASE

Marijuana causes lung disease, maybe even in higher rates than in that of tobacco users? Ridiculous. Marijuana and Tobacco smoke are near chemically identical and the only difference is marijuana’s psychoactive ingredients (THC). (21)

Oh. Okay. But what about those BIG huge TOKES that marijuana smokers do like on gravities and waterfalls? Yes, it’s true that these deep inhalations are larger per hit, but it’s not the amount of smoke per hit, but total amount of smoke inhaled (total volume of smoke) that is what causes irritation and problems. Tobacco smokers smoke on average 16.8 cigarettes per day which is way more than the average of 2 joints per day.

                                            

2. MARIJUANA IS ADDICTIVE

            Anything can addictives. Anything from eating frosty from Wendy’s to Playing world of war craft can be addicting. Addicted can be defined as being physically or mentally dependent on a particular activity, and unable to stop without incurring adverse effects. Wouldn't you call this “addiction”? 



There was a study conducted by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (60) that found out that while 77% of young adults had used marijuana, 74% of those had not used in the past year and 84% had not used in the past month.

Also in 1976 Clinical Studies of Cannabis dependence were conducted on test patients. These test patients were administered the equivalent of 15-20 joints a day and then ceased abruptly. Symptoms that occurred include sweating, decreased appetite, restlessness, and disturbed sleep, evidence of physical dependence. However, this symptoms were quite mild in nature (even when the dose was 15-20 joints per day! Nobody smokes that much per day). Thus when marijuana is consumed in its usual dose (average 2 joints), it would be difficult to note any physical dependence. 




3. MARIJUANA IS A GATEWAY DRUG

            A “gateway drug” is considered to be a drug that leads to the act further use of other drugs that otherwise would not been consumed without the consumption of the “gateway drug”.  Findings of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services found that over time, there has not been a consistent relationship between the consumption of weed and other drugs. Thus there is no observable relationship between the consumption of weed and other drugs. (83)
          

Drugs like cocaine, heroine, and LSD all have huge detrimental impacts on health. But we see that marijuana has minimal adverse effects on health… so why should it be banned?

IT SHOULDN’T!


The Controlled Substances Act of 1970 was the advent of harsh marijuana control in the U.S. The sale, control, and use of marijuana were now officially a punishable crime

But what has marijuana prohibition done for us? ALL it has done for us is further society’s susceptibility to violence, reduce economic efficiency, and decrease medicine availability.

1. VIOLENCE

            Remember the time when alcohol was banned? Yeeeah the ban from 1920 to 1933? Remember? The prohibition’s intention was to reduce alcohol and benefit society, but instead the rate of alcohol production / consumption and organized crime increase drastically, the exact opposite of the goal (^ Charles Hanson Towne, The Rise and Fall of Prohibition: The Human Side of What the Eighteenth Amendment Has Done to the United States (New York: Macmillan, 1923) p.159-162)

                                          

 Crimes in America during this time increased due to illegal production and transfer of alcohol. The prohibition was ended in 1933, and rates of crime dropped down to the low rates of pre 1920.


This is the current situation with Weed in America. 




Drug cartels are extremely dangerous many willing to murder in order to finish their job. Legalization will make these cartels unprofitable so many will have to shut down. A decrease in these groups could bring safety to many regions in both Mexico and the United States. 



2. Waste of Money and Resources

            Billions are spent on regulating something that has no harmful effects. Also, we waste tons of labor prohibiting marijuana. These people can be more productive (maybe some can even help grow it). Finally, the government spends even more money producing negative publicity for marijuana which all adds up to the population seeing it as far worse than it really is. (Here is a scientific look at the actual effect on your brain.)



… BENEFITS OF LEGALIZATION

1. Tax Revenues
      Billions and billions of dollars would be raised by state and federal government through a tax on marijuana similar to cigarette taxes. Our government is currently in a huge deficit, and has yet to find a clear remedy. Some government officials of California even predict a 14 billion dollar tax revenue increase if marijuana was legalized and regulated under tax (Source). Legalizing would be a huge boon not just to individual states but also to the nation as a whole and its reputation on the world stage. Currently, America is on the brink of economic disaster, having to service such an enormous debt to countries such as China, and legalizing weed at this juncture would alleviate America from all possibility of self-destruction. 

2. Shut down the black market f

Legalizing the sale and possession of marijuana would greatly weaken the illegal drug cartels. Weed is the largest commodity of the black market (stats), and taking this away from the black market would allow the transfer of money that would otherwise be circulating within the black market, to the legal American market. Money will naturally allocate back into the normal cycle of trade. Reducing the quantity of goods within the black market reduces the number of transactions. Illegal drug transactions is a crime itself, and is generally associated with other crimes such as murder to both involved and non-involved parties (crime). Thus legalizing marijuana will reduce the number of crimes, improving general welfare and safety. 


3. Hemp industry
      Cannabis hemp can be harvested and become a huge boon to the economy. Hemp industry has tremendous capabilities of anything from textiles to paper.  It would solve the problem of land. Some lands are not arable for some crops but may be arable for hemp. Hemp would maximize the use of land (resource) in America. The Hemp Industry will create tons of new jobs (YOU KNOW HOW IMPORTANT JOBS ARE RIGHT!) Hemp has very high yield, is environmentally friendly. Hemp has tons of good uses.
o   
4. Medical
      Marijuana could help alleviate many health problems.   It would also be a cheaper alternative to several other medications.





When the benefits outweigh the cons by this much, I think it makes the answer clear America...
LEGALIZE.




9 comments:

Cree Berry said...

We are on the same side of the argument, but I would argue that your blog could include a lot less humor and a lot more facts. Readers will get so consumed with the irrelevant videos and would not even understand or care about the argument. I would argue that media is great, but too much media is really a distraction. We would suggest cutting the videos that has absolutely nothing to do with marijuana. A post such as this will do nothing but humor people and push back our cause, which is legalizing marijuana. We think this post lacks a linear argument. It jumps all over the place.
Also the argument that anything could be addictive is invalid. Although it is very much true, the argument really holds no weight and is irrelevant to whether it should be legalized or not. We don’t fully understand what this point responds to on the opposing side. The opposing side main argument is it being a gate way drug, it causes health issues, Stoned driving and other dangers would be increased, that’s it’s just morally wrong, and blah blah and so forth. But I never heard the argument “that it could be addictive”.

Reasons for anti marijuana
http://www.1stmarijuanagrowerspage.com/legalization-of-marijuana-legalization/against-legalization-of-marijuana.html

Dominick Glavich said...

For starters I like the points/arguments you make to support your argument. They are concise, easy to read and they have pictures that summarize the point.
Your first point, marijuana causes lung disease, is very confusing. There are jumps in your thought. You say that because it is the same as tobacco it should be legalized? I don’t see how this can prove your point to be more effective in supporting your case. I did see that you said that there is a major difference in the amount of smoke inhaled, but no matter the amount you are still at a risk.http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=000234
Your second point, marijuana is addictive, doesn’t seem to help you prove your argument. You say that anything can be addictive, then my question would be, why add another problem to an already problematic nation? It seems that you are saying that just because everything is addictive, its ok to do another addictive thing.http://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/research-reports/marijuana-abuse/marijuana-addictive
Your third point, marijuana is a gateway drug, helps support your argument, but I would change the title to “is really a gateway drug.?” If I were to read your argument and saw this point I would probably remember that it is a gateway drug rather than the opposite.YALE STUDIES SAY THE OPPOSITE: http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Yale-study-Marijuana-may-really-be-gateway-drug-3805532.php
I like the violence argument. Its simple and it uses historic evidence to prove how ineffective prohibition was and that the only thing that came out of this were debt and crime.
Now, I have begun to actually see points that support your argument like the benefits section. I would keep these sections the same because like I’ve said before they are concise and effective in proving your point.

Unknown said...

So the first thing I would change is that one of the first sentences that your audience reads is already giving away your opinion about the topic. I would argue that it would be more effective if you stated your opinion later in the blog because that way you will attract readers who are for and against your argument. If you reveal your bias in the beginning of the blog the readers who are against your argument will quickly turn away from your blog and find another. (You're trying to have as big of an audience as you possibly can.)
Also the video of the guy acting out about his video game, I understand the point you're trying to put across but other people in the audience might not understand. I would argue that you could find another video that is more fact related, particularly scientific. One topic that is currently very interesting is the study of certain chemicals in the brain that endorse addictive behaviors; these studies could be very effective on getting the idea that almost anything could be addicting. The UNC Chapel Hill's library has a great resource that you could research some studies on these chemicals and you could use the information for your blog. Go here to look up some studies about addictive behaviors: http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&L=VB3LK7EB4T&N=100&S=SC&C=SO0138

Danny Gerowitz said...

You throw in statistics, but provide no links (websites) that prove that these statistics are true.
In the video “current situation with marijuana in America”, drug cartels deal with other drugs than marijuana. They deal heroine and cocaine too. Making marijuana legal, would not solve this problem since the other two drugs are still illegal. The 2nd video never states that the drug cartels were dealing with marijuana. Not sure how this supports your claim.
Where are the predictions that show that billions of dollars will be raised by state and federal government through taxation of marijuana.
According to the first paragraph of article listed below, the black market sells many items and many drugs. Just legalizing marijuana would not drastically slow down the black market. Tons of crimes will not disappear. In the 2nd link listed below, the quote about fifth of the way down (in green) states that when gambling was legalized, there was an increase in illegal gambling (sports gambling) around the nation. What stops this from happening to selling of marijuana?
http://businesstm.com/financial-planning/black-market-activities.html
http://www.cnbc.com/id/36267223/Why_We_Should_Not_Legalize_Marijuana

Unknown said...

Bring your own Bud:
“The three most prominent notions of weed are that is causes lung disease, is addictive, and is a gateway drug. They are all WAY over exaggerated.” This is completely biased, where are your citations to back this up?
Marijuana Causes Lung Disease:
“16.8 cigarettes per day” may have been relevant in 2004, but in eight years later is outdated. It isn’t the quantity of cigarettes or marijuana you smoke it’s the substances you are taking in. According to this article( articlehttp://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,326309,00.html), published in Jan 29, 2008, “smoking one joint is equivalent to 20 cigarettes in terms of lung cancer” and “cannabis smokers end up with five times more carbon monoxide in their bloodstream.” Regardless of smoking less cigarettes, cannabis has higher concentrations of carcinogens therefore becoming more dangerous to health one’s health.
Marijuana is Addictive:
Well this YouTube video could be a staged act.
“U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (60)” this should have a link so that I can look at your source. The clinical study taken place in 1976 does not seem relevant to 2012. You state that “symptoms were quite mild in nature (even when the dose was 15-20 joints per day! Nobody smokes that much per day)” well perhaps in 1976 it was “mild;” however according to an article in USA TODAY(http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/wellness/teen-ya/story/2011-10-16/Are-todays-parents-going-too-soft-on-kids-using-marijuana/50795182/1) “pot is at least 10 times stronger than in the 1970s and 80’s and more addictive.” You are correct that “it would be difficult to note any physical dependence,” but according to an article in Psychology Today (http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/reading-between-the-headlines/201205/is-marijuana-addictive)“marijuana is psychologically addictive, and the withdrawal includes psychological symptoms like anxiety, moods swings and depression.”
Marijuana is a Gateway Drug:
Link the page that includes the findings from the US Department of Health and Human Services. “There has not been a consistent relationship between the consumption of weed and other drugs;” however, according to TIMES (http://healthland.time.com/2010/10/29/marijuna-as-a-gateway-drug-the-myth-that-will-not-die/)and the National Institute on Drug Abuse “a person who smokes marijuana is more than 104 times more likely to use cocaine than a person who never tries pot.” There is a “correlation between marijuana use and other drug use.” This article lists two reasons to support the correlation between marijuana and harder drugs. First “people who are extremely interested in altering their consciousness are likely to want to try more than one way of doing it.” The second reason stated was, “marijuana’s illegality” one isn’t likely to “find a heroin dealer if one can’t even score weed.”

Cree Berry said...

You argue that the congress may be filled with idiots to listen to people like Anslinger, but in that time nearly everyone in the government was idiots. Before Civil rights time, multiple people believed that African Americans were descendants from Apes!!! People were abused physically and mentally and the government approves, so do you feel that this is idiotic too??? My point is, just because it may be idiotic to us now, the present, back then the things said by Anslinger and Hearst were valid points and also believable. Every quote I’ve listed below have been proven wrong!

Quotes by Anslinger
“There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the US, and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos, and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz, and swing, result from marijuana use. This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers, and any others.”
“…the primary reason to outlaw marijuana is its effect on the degenerate races.”
“Marijuana is an addictive drug which produces in its users insanity, criminality, and death.”
“Reefer makes darkies think they’re as good as white men.”
“You smoke a joint and you’re likely to kill your brother.”
“Marijuana is the most violence-causing drug in the history of mankind.”

Oh yea! Everything else you said, we agree with you. Thanks for the helpful criticisms!

Cree Berry said...

That was the response to your comments.

Eric Brian Linda said...

@ Mason & Friends
Thanks Mason & Friends. In the new blog post (bringyourownbud.blogspot.com), many of the issues that you have pointed out have been revised. You quoted my blog post with claims that did not have citing on it, but now in the new revised blog post, claims now have external links attached to them. Yes, you do refer to sources that are opposing to my claims, but "TIMES" ( I am assuming you are referring to the magazine company), is not as reputable as my scientific and data backed sources. Needless to say in this case, empirical evidence trumps sentiment.


http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2009/04/12/organized-crime-and-the-case-f/
http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Yale-study-Marijuana-may-really-be-gateway-drug-3805532.php
http://www.marijuanalibrary.org/Exposing_notes_1095.html#note21

Eric Brian Linda said...

Dom,
We agree with everything that you say. We will look into the links that you sent us and we will look into better links. We have changed our opinion on marijuana causing lung cancer. Marijuana doesn’t directly cause lung cancer. We also agree with you about the addictive point. We will take that part out and put in more supporting points.

Danny,
We will try to look for websites that back up our statistics. Also we will take out all the irrelevant links and data and put in more supporting data. Thank you for the link that you provided us. We will look into it.

Post a Comment